ELIZABETH L. HUGHES

v.

SARA E. TECHT, ALSO KNOWN AS SARAH E. TECHT

Citator

Cited By

• Chandler v. United States, 171 F.2d 921 (1st Cir. 1948)
  …outbreak of [*935] war ¡between the contracting parties. But see Karnuth v. United States ex rel. Albro, 1929, 279 U.S. 231, 49 S.Ct. 274, 73 L.Ed. 677; Techt v. Hughes, 1920, 229 N.Y. 222, 241, 128 N.E. 185, 11 A.L.R. 166, certiorari denied, 1920, 254 U.S. 643, 41 S.Ct. 14, 65 L.Ed. 454; 2 Hyde, International Law (2d Rev.Ed.1947) § 550. It also assumes that the treaty conferred a private right upon Chandler which he might assert in a court of the United States in bar of trial. But see Ker v. Illinois, 188…
• Senator Barry Goldwater v. Carter, 617 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …rolina Convention. . More recently, the Court in Clark v. Allen, 331 U.S. 503, 67 S.Ct. 1431, 91 L.Ed.2d 1632 (1947), quoted with approval language of then Judge Cardozo in Techt v. Hughes, 229 N.Y. 222, 243, 128 N.E. 185, 192 (1920), cert. denied, 254 U.S. 643, 41 S.Ct. 14, 65 L.Ed. 454 (1920): [T]he President and Senate may denounce the treaty, and thus terminate its life. Congress may enact an inconsistent rule, which will control the action of the courts. And in Teti v. Consolidated Coal Co., 217 F.…
• Williams v. Helene Wohlgemuth, 540 F.2d 163 (3d Cir. 1976)
  …isability of the Pennsylvania arrangement. “The wisdom or fairness of the [program, we] make no attempt to vindicate. Our duty is done when we enforce the law as it is written.” Techt v. Hughes, 229 N.Y. 222, 228-29, 128 N.E. 185, 186, cert, denied, 254 U.S. 643, 41 S.Ct. 14, 65 L.Ed. 454 (1920). See National League of Cities v. Usery, -U.S.-,-, 96 S.Ct. 2465, 49 L.Ed.2d 245 (1976) (Stevens, J., dissenting). . This does not mean that the states may not appropriately define which situations constitute emerg…