E. HAMILTON ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Lurton Lewis Heflin, Jr. v. United States, 223 F.2d 371 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …es, 8 Cir., 26 F. 2d 63. See also Annotation, 41 A.L.R. 1530. And certainly there was no strong probability that the absence of these witnesses affected the result of the trial. See Lockhart v. United States, 6 Cir., 264 F. 14, 16, certiorari denied 254 U.S. 645, 41 S.Ct. 14, 65 L.Ed. 455. (4) The admission of certain testimony of Mrs. Patsy Ruth Hornbeck [*376] was improper, but we think its later exclusion and the instructions to the jury to disregard it cured the error. The testimony in question was adm…
• Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …mly rooted in federal maritime law.9 For years this warranty was considered contractual in nature. E.g., The [*229] Osceola, 1903, 189 U.S. 158, 171-75, 23 S.Ct. 483, 47 L.Ed. 760; Hamilton v. United States, 4 Cir. 1920, 268 F. 15, 21, cert. denied, 254 U.S. 645, 41 S.Ct. 15, 65 L.Ed. 454; Rainey v. New York & P. S.S. Co., 9 Cir. 1914, 216 F. 449, 453, cert. denied, 235 U.S. 704, 35 S.Ct. 209, 59 L.Ed. 433; see Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki, 1946, 328 U.S. 85, 90, 66 S.Ct. 872, 90 L.Ed. 1099. Recently, howe…
• Ansley v. United States, 135 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1943)
  …. United States, 8 Cir., 96 F. 2d 41; Crabb v. United States, 10 Cir., 99 F. 2d 325; Lambert v. United States, 5 Cir., 101 F. 2d 960; Hemphill v. United States, 9 Cir., 112 F. 2d 505. Lockhart v. United States, 6 Cir., 264 F. 14, certiorari denied, 254 U.S. 645, 41 S.Ct. 14, 65 L.Ed. 455; Clements v. United States, 9 Cir., 297 F. 206, certiorari denied, 266 U.S. 605, 45 S.Ct. 92, 69 L.Ed. 464; Mitchell v. United States, 9 Cir., 23 F. 2d 260, certiorari denied, 277 U.S. 594, 48 S.Ct. 530, 72 L.Ed. 1005; McA…