ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

C. B. JOHNSON

Citator

Cited By

• Cnty. of Okeechobee v. Fla. Nat'l Bank of Jacksonville, 112 Fla. 309 (Fla. 1933)
  …Federal statute is invoked in a state court all matters of practice and procedure are controlled by the law of the forum. Minn. & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 60 Law Ed. 961, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 599; Illinois Central R. Co. v. Johnson, 254 U. S. 654, 41 Sup. Ct. 218, 65 Law Ed. 459; St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Glow Electric Co., 35 Ohio App. 291, 172 N. E. 425; Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U. S. 22, 44 Sup. Ct. 13, 68 Law Ed. 143; Lee v. Central of Georgia R. Co., 252 U. S. 109, 40 Sup. Ct. 254…
• Roberts v. S. Sur. Co., 33 F.2d 501 (4th Cir. 1929)
  …he master, whose findings were set aside by the trial court, heard and saw the witness who testified, cannot be disregarded on appeal from the decree entered by the court on its findings.” Dorrance v. Dorrance (C. C. A.) 264 F. 54, certiorari denied 254 U. S. 654, 41 S. Ct. 216, 65 L. Ed. 459. In the instant ease it would, therefore, seem to be the duty of this court to examine the evidence offered and determine the facts for itself, bearing in mind the proposition above laid down, to wit: That the master w…