ALEXANDER NEW ET AL., RECEIVERS, ETC.
v.
EFFIE MCMILLAN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.
ALEXANDER NEW ET AL., RECEIVERS, ETC.
EFFIE MCMILLAN, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.
254 U.S. 657
Supreme Court of the United States (1921)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
O'Connor v. United States, 269 F.2d 578 (2d Cir. 1959)…reason of the father’s death. Judge Swan said in the former opinion of this court that nothing is allowed for consortium and parental care and cited [*584] the Oklahoma case of New v. McMillan, 1920, 79 Old. 70, 191 P. 160, certiorari denied, 1921, 254 U.S. 657, 41 S.Ct. 320, 65 L.Ed. 460. The portion of the McMillan case which he quoted in the footnote makes it quite clear that the consortium and parental care referred to concern sentimental and emotional factors such as loss of society and companionship…
-
Joyce O'Connor as Administratrix of Benedict O'Connor v. United States, 251 F.2d 939 (2d Cir. 1958)…es, 5 Cir., 218 F. 2d 473, 476; United States v. Praylou, 4 Cir., 208 F. 2d 291, 295. . Crossett v. Andrews, Okl., 277 P. 2d 117; Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Sutton, Okl., 257 P. 2d 307, 316; New v. McMillan, 79 Okl. 70, 191 P. 160, certiorari denied 254 U.S. 657, 41 S.Ct. 320, 65 L.Ed. 460. . In the McMillan case, cited in footnote 3, the court said at page 166 of 191 P.: “ * * * The law does not undertake to heal the wounds of grief nor to supply the counsels and comforts of a husband and father, and very…