ABDUL SAMAD

v.

HENRY BEHRANDT, U. S. MARSHAL, ETC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Consol. Rail Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 646 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …a responsibility to protect their employees, their property and the public from harmful radiation.” Eastern Railroads, supra, 362 ICC at 772. See also Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. John Lysaght, Ltd., 271 F. 906, 910-11 (2d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 257 U.S. 613, 42 S.Ct. 53, 66 L.Ed. 397 (1921). Obviously this does not mean that every cost allegedly incurred for a safety reason need be approved by the Commission. The mere assertion of safety as a justification for any particular expenditure by a railroad…
• Head v. Brainard, 5 F.2d 289 (9th Cir. 1925)
  …[*291] without merit and is not filed in good faith, then the court has power to make an order requiring the wrongful holder to surrender to the trustee and to direct administration. In re Eilers Music House (C. C. A.) 270 P. 917, certiorari denied 257 U. S. 613, 646, 42 S. Ct. 53, 55, 66 L. Ed. 397, 414. In Taubel, etc., Co. v. Fox, 264 U. S. 426, 44 S. Ct. 396, 68 L. Ed. 770, the court held that under the act of 1898 the bankruptcy court had power to adjudicate, without consent, controversies concerning t…
• Ali v. Lehrhaupt, 258 U.S. 611 (U.S. 1922)
  …Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 217-218; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 185. See Samad v. Behrandt, 257 U. S. 613.…

Authorities Cited

• Sugarman v. United States, 249 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1919)
• Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1915)