JULIA BOYLAN ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1921-11-07
No. 111
257 U.S. 614 Supreme Court of the United States (1921) Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction, due to failure to apply for writ of error within the statutory period which began with the date of the entry of the final judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals" to which the writ of error issued, and not with date of the entry of the judgment in the District Court under the mandate of the Circuit Court of Appeals. Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726, 727.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Giannone v. United States Steel Corp. (Defendant) & Philadelphia Elec. Co. (Third-Party, 238 F.2d 544 (3d Cir. 1956)
    …1942, 325 F. 2d 863; Kunglig Jarn vagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc., supra note 2; Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. Allied Machinery Co. of America, 2 Cir., 271 F. 900, certiorari denied 256 U.S. 704, 41 S.Ct. 625, 65 L.Ed. 1180, motion denied, 1921, 257 U.S. 614, 42 S.Ct. 93, 66 L.Ed. 398. Cf. White v. Mechanics Securities Corp., 1925, 269 U.S. 283, 46 S.Ct. 116, 70 L.Ed. 275. Contra Delaware County Com’rs v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co., 1890, 133 U.S. 473, 10 S.Ct. 399, 33 L.Ed. 674; Combs v. Hodge, 1859, 21…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw