CITY OF LOUISVILLE
v.
LOUISVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY

U.S. | 1921-12-19
No. 592
257 U.S. 619 Supreme Court of the United States (1921) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Sitka, 845 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1988)
    …of its consummation” and not on the date of the Secretary of State’s proclamation); United States ex rel. Widenmann v. Colby, 265 F. 998, 999-1000 (D.C.Cir.1920) (terming the Secretary of State’s power under section 205 “purely ministerial”), aff'd, 257 U.S. 619, 42 S.Ct. 169, 66 L.Ed. 400 (1921). This conclusion is underscored by the fact that the comparable authority today is vested in the Archivist of the United States. See 1 U.S.C. § 106b. See also note 2, supra. Thus, Congress has not improperly delega…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw