KING COUNTY
v.
HEWITT-LEA LUMBER COMPANY

U.S. | 1922-01-30
No. 344
257 U.S. 622 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U. S. 413, 418, 419; Gray’s Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19. Writ of certiorari denied upon the same ground.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cont'l Ins. Co. v. United States, 259 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1922)
  • Int'l Life Ins. Co. v. Sherman, 262 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1923)
    …mont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Fay v. Crozer, 217 U. S. 455; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100. See also decisions per curiam: Nesmith v. Ohio, 257 U. S. 622; Pueblo of Laguna v. Candelaria, id. 623; Harvey v. Union Traction Co., id. 624; Winehill & Rosenthal v. Louisiana, 258 U. S. 605; Hartford Life Insurance Co. v. Johnson, id. 612; Lindsey v. Allen, id. 613. Cf. Reynolds v. Stockton, 140 U. S. 254,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw