WINEHILL & ROSENTHAL
v.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

U.S. | 1922-03-13
No. 163
258 U.S. 605 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Int'l Life Ins. Co. v. Sherman, 262 U.S. 346 (U.S. 1923)
    …ich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100. See also decisions per curiam: Nesmith v. Ohio, 257 U. S. 622; Pueblo of Laguna v. Candelaria, id. 623; Harvey v. Union Traction Co., id. 624; Winehill & Rosenthal v. Louisiana, 258 U. S. 605; Hartford Life Insurance Co. v. Johnson, id. 612; Lindsey v. Allen, id. 613. Cf. Reynolds v. Stockton, 140 U. S. 254, 264; Rev. Stats., § 737; Equity Rules 47 and 48, in force in 1908.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw