EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL SINGER, PETITIONER

U.S. | 1922-04-17
258 U.S. 610 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Jenkins, 91 F.2d 183 (8th Cir. 1937)
    …ne of the exceptions. We think the section precludes the awarding of such relief in the federal courts. See Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford County, 281 U.S. 121, 127, 50 S.Ct. 270, 272, 74 L.Ed. 737; Engelhard v. Shroeder (C.C.A.) 278 F. 341, affirmed 258 U.S. 610, 42 S.Ct. 382, 66 L.Ed. 789. (3) Strong proof that federal courts have considered themselves without power to grant new trials for newly discovered evidence in cases which have been brought to judgment in state courts is to be found in the meticulo…
  • Mrs. Mary St. Tammany O'Connor McCarthy v. Wood, 245 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1957)
    …L.Ed. 80; Sutton v. English, 1918, 246 U.S. 199, 38 S.Ct. 254, 62 L.Ed. 664; Fakouri v. Cadais, 5 Cir., 1945, 147 F. 2d 667; Sullivan v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F. 2d 393. . Engelhard v. Schroeder, 3 Cir., 278 F. 341, affirmed 258 U.S. 610, 42 S.Ct. 382, 66 L.Ed. 789; Hudson v. Lewis, 5 Cir., 188 F. 2d 679.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw