EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL SINGER, PETITIONER
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL SINGER, PETITIONER
258 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Jenkins, 91 F.2d 183 (8th Cir. 1937)…ne of the exceptions. We think the section precludes the awarding of such relief in the federal courts. See Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford County, 281 U.S. 121, 127, 50 S.Ct. 270, 272, 74 L.Ed. 737; Engelhard v. Shroeder (C.C.A.) 278 F. 341, affirmed 258 U.S. 610, 42 S.Ct. 382, 66 L.Ed. 789. (3) Strong proof that federal courts have considered themselves without power to grant new trials for newly discovered evidence in cases which have been brought to judgment in state courts is to be found in the meticulo…
-
Mrs. Mary St. Tammany O'Connor McCarthy v. Wood, 245 F.2d 853 (5th Cir. 1957)…L.Ed. 80; Sutton v. English, 1918, 246 U.S. 199, 38 S.Ct. 254, 62 L.Ed. 664; Fakouri v. Cadais, 5 Cir., 1945, 147 F. 2d 667; Sullivan v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co., 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F. 2d 393. . Engelhard v. Schroeder, 3 Cir., 278 F. 341, affirmed 258 U.S. 610, 42 S.Ct. 382, 66 L.Ed. 789; Hudson v. Lewis, 5 Cir., 188 F. 2d 679.…