JOSEPH MANDEVILLE, ONE OF THE FIRM OF RICHARD SLADE & CO., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
GEORGE HOLEY AND THOMAS SUCKLEY, JOINT MERCHANTS IN TRADE, UNDER THE FIRM OF HOLEY & SUCKLEY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

U.S. | 1828-01-01
1 Pet. 136 Supreme Court of the United States (1828) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 7 L. Ed. 85 · SCDB 1828-002 · 1828 U.S. LEXIS 396
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
.Mr. Chief Justice Marshall

.Mr. Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court.—

The Court are satisfied in this case, that under the law of Virginia, a-confession of judgment by the plaintiff in error, in the original suit, is a release of errors.

Judgment affirmed,' with costs and damages, at the rate of six per centum per annum.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Parkerson v. Chapman, 179 F.2d 208 (4th Cir. 1950)
    …of trust with respect to the terms or manner of sale. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Kennedy, 146 Va. 197, 135 S.E. 882; Schmidt & Wilson v. Carneal, 164 Va. 412, 180 S.E. 325; Wilson v. Wall, 99 Va. 353, 38 S.E. 181; Greenleaf v. Queen, 1 Pet. 138, 145, 7 L.Ed. 85. While such a departure from the terms of the deed of trust would not render a sale, which has been approved by court order, subject to collateral attack, it is a circumstance to be considered by a court of equity in enforcing the rights of a cestui…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw