CLARENCE REEVES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CLARENCE REEVES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
169 So. 2d 522
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order denying relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
The defendant was indicted by grand jury, declared insolvent and represented by court-appointed counsel, pleaded not guilty, tried and found guilty of assault with intent to commit rape.
The record of the trial was transcribed and considered along with the minutes of the Court. From such record it appears that the defendant was represented by counsel at all critical stages of the trial.
Accordingly, the order denying relief is
Affirmed.
ALLEN, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sausman Diversified Invs., Inc. v. The Cobbs Co., Inc., 208 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…n be obtained only for those obligations or causes of action which arise out of the activities of the defendant within the State of Florida. See Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Simari, Fla.1966, 191 So. 2d 427; Unterman v. Brown, Fla.App. 1964, 169 So. 2d 522. We, therefore, find that the defendant was not engaged in a business or business venture within the State of Florida and that this cause of action did not arise out of the activities of the defendant, Sausman, within the state. Cobbs claims that…
-
Am. Liberty Ins. Co. v. Maddox, 238 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)…yield to the higher purpose.” Demos v. Walker (1930), 99 Fla. 302, 126 So. 305. . See, e. g., Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith (Fla.1965), 176 So. 2d 903; Tibbetts v. Olson (1926), 91 Fla. 824, 108 So. 679 and Unterman v. Brown (Fla.App.2d 1964), 169 So. 2d 522.…
-
Klein v. Mega Trading, 416 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…da authority directly on point, we conclude that the contacts created by an investment in a Florida limited partnership are no greater than those of the non-resident corporate officer and director of a Florida company described in Unterman v. Brown, 169 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). See also Uible v. Landstreet, 392 F. 2d 467 (5th Cir. 1968). For the foregoing reasons, the order denying the motion to quash is reversed. Reversed.…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence