UNITED STATES
v.
NORTHEASTERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
UNITED STATES
NORTHEASTERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
260 U.S. 326
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Caution
Also reported at: 67 L. Ed. 287 · 43 S. Ct. 129 · SCDB 1922-042 · 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2371
Cited by 52 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the Court.
Judgment in this case was rendered at the same time as that in Mason & Hanger Co. v. United States, just decided, ante, 323.
The amounts only are different. In that case it was $2,500 — in this case it is $150. In both, the amounts represented premiums on bonds and depend upon the same considerations. ' On the authority of the Mason & Hanger Co. Case the judgment of the Court of Claims in this case is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (24 total)
-
Temistocles Ramirez de Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, 745 F.2d 1500 (D.C. Cir. 1984)…Congress because it was within the discretion of the Civil Aeronautics Board, under the congressional statute, to prescribe an air traffic route like the one at issue. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States, 260 U.S. 327, 43 S.Ct. 135, 67 L.Ed. 287 (1922), also supports this principle. The Court stated that because the military officials were authorized to build the fort in question and to staff it with guns and men, it would be reluctant to find lack of authority for the firing of the cannons…
-
Eyherabide v. The United States, 345 F.2d 565 (Ct. Cl. 1965)…tes v. General Motors Corp., 323 U.S. 373, 378, 65 S.Ct. 357, 89 L.Ed. 311 (1945); Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393, 413, 43 S.Ct. 158, 67 L.Ed. 322 (1922); Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States, 260 U.S. 327, 43 S.Ct. 135, 67 L.Ed. 287 (1922); Block v. Hirsh, 256 U.S. 135, 155-156, 41 S.Ct. 458, 65 L.Ed. 865 (1921). The interference with use or possession may be so substantial and of such a character that it cannot be done without compensation under the Federal Government’s regula…
-
Drakes BAY Land Co. v. The United States, 424 F.2d 574 (Ct. Cl. 1970)…ts agents implementing its programs can effect takings without recourse to the usual machinery of land acquisition, that is, purchase or condemnation. 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States, 260 U.S. 327, 43 S.Ct. 135, 67 L.Ed. 287 (1922). We have looked for an element of actual physical invasion in such eases, as in Eyherabide v. United States, 345 F. 2d 565, 170 Ct.Cl. 598 (1965), but this is because there was “no official intention to acquire any property interest,” Eyher…
Previewing 3 of 24 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence