HENRY F. MUELLER ET AL.
v.
SAMUEL W. ADLER ET AL.
HENRY F. MUELLER ET AL.
SAMUEL W. ADLER ET AL.
260 U.S. 694
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want .of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co., 228 U. S. 137, 144; Apapas v. United States, 233 U. S. 587, 589; (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 372; Public Service Co. v. Corboy, 250 U. S. 153, 162; De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U. S. 166, 173.
Mr. William J. Hughes and Mr. Ephrim Caplan for appellants. Mr. Edward W. Foristel for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. W. Union Tel. Co., 234 U.S. 369 (U.S. 1914)
- Pub. Serv. Co. of N. Ill. v. Corboy, 250 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1919)
- Bogart v. S. Pac. Co., 228 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1913)
- Apapas v. United States, 233 U.S. 587 (U.S. 1914)
- De Rees v. Costaguta, 254 U.S. 166 (U.S. 1920)