EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF HUEY P. LONG ET AL., ETC., PETITIONERS, AND CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY
v.
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF HUEY P. LONG ET AL., ETC., PETITIONERS, AND CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.
260 U.S. 698
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. Am. Cast Iron Pipe Co., 411 F.2d 998 (5th Cir. 1969)…. Only those matters involved in the appeal are divested from jurisdiction of the lower court. Janousek v. Doyle, 8 Cir., 1963, 313 F. 2d 916, 921. We do not consider the dicta in Corona Coal Co. v. Southern Ry., N.D. Ala., 1920, 266 F. 726, aff’d, 260 U.S. 698, 43 S.Ct. 91, 67 L.Ed. 470, as controlling, since it only affects the exercise of the court’s discretion. . For an example of the flexibility available to the District Judge to prevent a ease from getting beyond judicial redress, see Local 53 v. Vo…