PORTO RICO RAILWAY, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY
v.
MANUEL CAMUNAS ET AL., ETC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1922-10-23
No. 70
260 U.S. 700 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. El Banco Popular v. Wilcox, 255 U. S. 72; Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. Ward, 242 U. S. 1.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Berger v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of N.Y., 105 F.2d 1001 (2d Cir. 1939)
    …79, 73 L.Ed. 557); People of Porto Rico v. American R. Co. of Porto Rico, I Cir., 254 F. 369, 377, certiorari denied, 249 U.S. 600, 39 S.Ct. 259, 63 L.Ed. 796; Camunas v. Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co,, 1 Cir., 272 F. 924, 931, appeal dismissed, 260 U.S. 700, 43 S.Ct. 91, 67 L.Ed. 470. Instances where Congress has specifically disapproved, in whole or in part, acts of territorial legislatures are found in First National Bank v. Yankton County, 101 U.S. 129, 25 L.Ed. 1046, and Late Corporation of the Ch…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw