JOHN SIMON
v.
AMERICAN EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK ET AL.

U.S. | 1922-12-11
No. 94
260 U.S. 706 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U. S. 554; Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U. S. 239.

Mr. Henry A. Wise for appellant. Mr. James A. Fowler, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Seymour, Mr. Guy'D. Goff, Mr. Adna R. Johnson, Jr., and Mr. Dean Hill Stanley, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, were on the brief, for appellees. -

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Sutherland, 23 F.2d 595 (2d Cir. 1928)
    …the requirement for such transfer. Great Northern Railway v. Sutherland, 273 U. S. 182, 47 S. Ct. 315, 71 L. Ed. 596; Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. Miller, 262 U. S. 51, 43 S. Ct. 486, 67 L. Ed. 858; Simon v. American Exchange National Bank, 260 U. S. 706, 43 S. Ct. 165, 67 L. Ed. 474; Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U. S. 239, 41 S. Ct. 293, 65 L. Ed. 604; Central Union Trust Co. v. Garvan, 254 U. S. 554, 41 S. Ct. 214, 65 L. Ed. 403. All the rights and equities which may have existed in favor of the appella…
  • Clark v. Mfrs. Tr. Co., 169 F.2d 932 (2d Cir. 1948)
    …it must, that a debtor must pay to the Custodian an acknowledged debt regardless of any controversy as to who is the creditor. American Exchange National Bank v. Garvan, 2 Cir., 273 F. 43, affirmed sub nom. Simon v. American Exchange National Bank, 260 U.S. 706, 43 S.Ct. 165, 67 L.Ed. 474. This imposes no hardship, since the debtor is protected by § 7(e) from pursuit by any other person. But when the existence of the debt is denied, the appellant contends that requiring it to be paid before judicial determ…
  • United States v. Jones, 100 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1938)
    …and his acceptance of less than the full statutory compensation did not estop him nor his beneficiary from claiming the entire amount due from the government. Emmons v. United States, 63 Ct.Cl. 121; Bancroft v. United States, 56 Ct.Cl. 218, affirmed 260 U.S. 706, 43 S.Ct. 165, 67 L.Ed. 473; Glavey v. United States, 182 U.S. 595, 21 S.Ct. 891, 45 L.Ed. 1247; United States v. Andrews, 240 U.S. 90, 94, 36 S.Ct. 349, 60 L.Ed. 541; MacMath v. United States, 248 U.S. 151, 152, 39 S.Ct. 31, 63 L.Ed. 177. There is…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw