HENRY P. REED ET AL.
v.
VILLAGE OF HIBBING ET AL.
HENRY P. REED ET AL.
VILLAGE OF HIBBING ET AL.
260 U.S. 709
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6. Mr. H. V. Mercer for plaintiffs in' error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. United States, 230 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1956)…recommendation by the agency superintendent. See, too, Daniels v. United States, 9 Cir., 17 F. 2d 339, certiorari denied Ap-pell v. U. S., 274 U.S. 744, 47 S.Ct. 591, 71 L.Ed. 1325; McGrath v. United States, 2 Cir., 275 F. 294, dismissed per curiam 260 U.S. 709, 43 S.Ct. 249, 67 L.Ed. 475; Sears v. United States, 1 Cir., 264 F. 257, 261; Sharp v. United States, 10 Cir., 138 F. 878. We have considered the cases cited by counsel for Wilson. These cases, we think, against the impressive line of authority we…
-
Callahan v. United States, 122 F.2d 216 (D.C. Cir. 1941)…U.S. 557, 57 S.Ct. 19, 81 L.Ed. 410. " That a person who is appointed in accordance with the constitutional provision * * * is an officer of the United States is * * * clear.” McGrath v. United States, 2 Cir., 275 F. 294, 300, 301, appeal dismissed 260 U.S. 709, 43 S.Ct. 249, 67 L.Ed. 475. United States v. Hartwell, 73 U.S. 385, 393, 6 Wall. 385, 393, 18 L.Ed. 830; United States v. Germaine, 99 U.S. 508, 510, 25 L.Ed. 482. Martin v. United States, 8 Cir., 168 F. 198, 202; “if there is a reasonable doubt w…
Authorities Cited
- Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton, 252 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1920)