STATE OF OKLAHOMA

v.

STATE OF TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden de Predicadores de la Provincia del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas, 263 U.S. 578 (U.S. 1924)
  …an DeaanteR delivered the opinion of the Court. This was an action to recover money paid under protest as a tax on income. The plaintiff prevailed in the Philippine courts, both trial and appellate, 42 Phil. 397, and the case is here on certiorari, 260 U. S. 711. The tax was levied under paragraphs G (a) and M of § II of the Act of October 3, 1913, c. 16, 38 Stat. 172, 180, requiring every corporation, not within defined exceptions, to pay an annual tax, computed at a specified rate, on its entire net inco…
• United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …onzi v. Fessenden, 1922, 258 U.S. 254, 265, 42 S.Ct. 309, 66 L.Ed. 607; Wall v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 1940, 108 F. 2d 865; Carroll v. Zerbst, 10 Cir., 1935, 76 F. 2d 961; Ex Parte Lamar, 2 Cir., 1921, 274 F. 160, 176, 177, 24 A.L.R. 864, affirmed 1923, 260 U.S. 711, 43 S.Ct. 251, 67 L.Ed. 476; United States v. Wright, D.C.E.D.Ill.1944, 56 F.Supp. 489. Defendants Santore, Orlando, Tarlen-tino and Narducci were represented on appeal by The Legal Aid Society, Thomas A. Shaw, Jr., of counsel for Santore and Orlan…
• Frankel v. Woodrough, 7 F.2d 796 (8th Cir. 1925)
  …is serving sentence on another conviction. We think the rule in the federal courts is settled that imprisonment has no such effect. Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U. S. 254, 261, 264, 42 S. Ct. 309, 66 L. Ed. 607, 22 A. L. R. 879; Lamar v. United States, 260 U. S. 711, 43 S. Ct. 251, 67 L. Ed. 476 (memorandum opinion affirming Ex parte Lamar [C. C. A.] 274 F.160, 170, 24 A. L. R. 864); also see Collins v. Loisel, 262 U. S. 426, 431, 43 S. Ct. 618, 67 L. Ed. 1062, and Ex parte Sichofsky, 273 F. 694 (affirmed [C. C…

Authorities Cited

• State of Okla. v. State of Tex. United States, 258 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1922)