FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

v.

RAYMOND BROS.-CLARK COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Red Cross Line v. Atl. Fruit Co., 264 U.S. 109 (U.S. 1924)
  …ralty courts; and that the State had no power to compel the charter owner to proceed to arbitration. Matter of Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 233 N. Y. 373. The case is here on writ of certiorari under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended. 260 U. S. 716. Respondent contends that the petition should be dismissed for lack of a federal question. The argument is that the Court of Appeals held, as a matter of statutory construction, that the Arbitration Law does not extend to controversies which are wi…
• Bunch v. Cole, 263 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1923)
  …one over his objection that the state statute, so construed and applied, was in conflict with the congressional restrictions, and therefore was invalid. The plaintiff prosecutes this writ of error. Upon his petition a writ of certiorari whs granted, 260 U. S. 716, but as it appears that the writ of error was well grounded, the writ of certiorari will be dismissed. The power of Congress to impose restrictions on the right of Indian wards of the United States to alien or lease lands allotted to them in the di…
• Toledo Pipe-Threading Mach. Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 11 F.2d 337 (6th Cir. 1926)
  …method, employed by the manufacturer and its distributors, customers, and agents, to keep others from getting the company’s goods at less than the stated prices. Page 445 (42 S. Ct. 150). Federal Trade Commission v. Raymond-Clark Co., 43 S. Ct. 93, 260 U. S. 716, 67 L. Ed. 478, was not a price-maintenance case, but it did involve and declare again the absolute right of a trader not to trade against his will, approving the Colgate Case. The opinion is probably helpful here, in that it emphasizes a concert of…