JOHN E. THROPP'S SONS COMPANY

v.

FRANK A. SEIBERLING

Citator

Cited By

• Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty, 264 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1924)
  …injunction against the use of the above marks except on the original packages as marked and sold by the plaintiff, thinking that the defendant could not put upon the plaintiff the burden of keeping a constant watch. 285 Fed. 501. Certiorari granted, 260 U. S. 720. The bill does not charge the defendant with adulterating or otherwise deteriorating the plaintiff’s product except that it intimates rather than alleges metal containers to be bad, and the Circuit Court of Appeals stated that there were no controv…
• Magnum Imp. Co., Inc. v. Coty, 262 U.S. 159 (U.S. 1923)
  …and owners of the trade-mark, the process of rebottling and repacking injures the perfumes and impairs the value of the trade-mark and the reputation of the manufacturers. In a case presenting a similar question, to wit, Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty, 260 U. S. 720, this Court granted a writ of certiorari, and applications in the above entitled cases are now pending. They are also before us on petitions praying that this Court issue orders suspending the operation of the decrees of the Circuit Court of Appeals…