R. C. WOOD ET AL.
v.
F. G. NOYES, AS RECEIVER, ETC.
R. C. WOOD ET AL.
F. G. NOYES, AS RECEIVER, ETC.
260 U.S. 732
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Klosterman, 248 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1957)…igns of the defendant are relevant.” 287 U.S. at page 451, 53 S.Ct. at page 216. The decisions of this court which predate the Sorrells case expressed views consistent with it. Luterman v. United States, 3 Cir., 281 F. 374, certiorari denied, 1922, 260 U.S. 732, 43 S.Ct. 94, 67 L.Ed. 486; Zucker v. United States, 3 Cir., 288 F. 12, certiorari denied, 1923, 262 U.S. 756, 43 S.Ct. 703, 67 L.Ed. 1218; Rosso v. United States, 3 Cir., 1924, 1 F. 2d 717. And our decisions after Sorrells have fully recognized and…
-
Mid-Continent Supply Co. v. Atkins & Potter Drilling Corp., 229 F.2d 68 (10th Cir. 1956)…may apply the proceeds of a general payment made by the debtor to the obligation or obligations not endorsed or otherwise guaranteed by the third parties. Kortlander v. Elston, 6 Cir., 52 F. 180; Wood v. Noyes, 9 Cir., 279 F. 321, certiorari denied, 260 U.S. 732, 43 S.Ct. 94, 67 L.Ed. 486; Robinson v. Waddell, 53 Kan. 402, 36 P. 730; California National Bank of San Diego v. Ginty, 108 Cal. 148, 41 P. 38; Security Trust & Savings Bank v. June, 38 Ariz. 513, 1 P. 2d 970; Livermore Falls Trust & Banking Co. v.…