ARMOUR & COMPANY

v.

LOUISVILLE PROVISION COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Penn-Maryland Corp., 79 F.2d 836 (2d Cir. 1935)
  …isements of the appellant and its labels plainly show that its product is not the appellee’s. The public must be credited with a minimum capacity for discrimination. Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co., 283 F. 42 (C. C. A. 6), certiorari denied 260 U. S. 744, 43 S. Ct. 164, 67 L. Ed. 492; Wornova Mfg. Co., Inc., v. McCawley & Co., 11 F.(2d) 465 (C. C. A. 2); Stevens linen Works v. William & John Don & Co., 121 F. 171, 173 (C. C. S. D. N. Y.). The commercial impression of a trademark is derived from it…
• Glenmore Distilleries Co. v. Nat'l Distillers Prods. Corp., 101 F.2d 479 (4th Cir. 1939)
  …ca-Cola Co. v. Carlisle Bottling Works, D. C., 43 F. 2d 101, affirmed 6 Cir., 43 F. 2d 119; Gold Dust Corp. v. Hoffenberg, 2 Cir., 87 F. 2d 451; Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co., D.C., 275 F. 92, affirmed 6 Cir., 283 F. 42, certiorari denied 260 U.S. 744, 43 S.Ct. 164, 67 L.Ed. 492; Sears-Roebuck & Co. v. Elliott Varnish Co., 7 Cir., 232 F. 588; Valvoline Oil Co. v. Havoline Oil Co., D. C., 211 F. 189; Eskimo Pie Corp. v. Honey Moon Pie Corp., D.C., 25 F. 2d 154; Eskimo Pie Corp. v. Levous, D.C., 24…
• Colo. Wool Mktg. Ass'n v. Monaghan, 66 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1933)
  …. 8) 25 F.(2d) 794; Von Boston v. United Rys. Co. of St. Louis (C. C. A. 8) 8 F.(2d) 826, certiorari denied 271 U. S. 665, 46 S. Ct. 475, 70 L. Ed. 1140; Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Southern Traction Co. (C. C. A. 7) 283 F. 50, certiorari denied 260 U. S. 744, 43 S. Ct. 166, 67 L. Ed. 492; International Trust Co. v. United Coal Co., 27 Colo. 246, 60 P. 621, 83 Am. St. Rap. 59; Hanna v. State Trust Co. (C. C. A. 8) 70 F. 2, 30 L. R. A. 201; Clark on Receivers, §, 637. The ease of Hanna v. State Trust C…