W. K. EPHRAIM ET AL.
v.
NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA LAND AND LIVE STOCK COMPANY ET AL.
W. K. EPHRAIM ET AL.
NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA LAND AND LIVE STOCK COMPANY ET AL.
260 U.S. 748
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., 148 F.2d 974 (2d Cir. 1945)…edge agreements were not recorded, we need not decide in which category promissory notes may fall. See, also, Sparhawk v. Drexel, C.C.E.D.Pa., Fed.Cas.No.13,204; In re Thompson, D.C.W.D.Pa., 276 F. 313, affirmed 3 Cir., 284 F. 65, certiorari denied 260 U.S. 748, 43 S.Ct. 248, 67 L.Ed. 491; Coleman v. Solomon, 225 Ala. 407, 143 So. 576; Perkins v. Applegate, Ky., 85 S.W. 723; Hagan v. Continental Nat. Bank, 182 Mo. 319, 81 S.W. 171; Anchor v. Gose, Tex.Civ.App., 8 S.W. 2d 690; Foote v. Utah Commercial & Sav…