EXCHANGE OIL COMPANY
v.
F. C. CARTER, AS STATE AUDITOR, ETC., ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA; EXCHANGE OIL COMPANY V. F. C. CARTER, AS STATE AUDITOR, ETC.; EXCHANGE OIL COMPANY V. F. C. CARTER, AS STATE AUDITOR, ETC.; AND EXCHANGE OIL COMPANY V. F. C. CARTER, AS STATE AUDITOR, ETC.

U.S. | 1923-01-08
Nos. 12; No. 13; No. 14; No. 15
260 U.S. 757 Supreme Court of the United States (1923) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Walker, 145 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
    …; Horner v. United States, 143 U.S. 207, 12 S.Ct. 407, 36 L. Ed. 126; Horner v. United States, 143 U. S. 570, 12 S.Ct. 522, 36 L.Ed. 266. Burleson v. United States ex rel. Workingmen’s Co-Op. Pub. Ass’n, 51 App.D.C. 65, 274 F. 749, error dismissed, 260 U.S. 757, 43 S.Ct. 246, 67 L.Ed. 499; Magon v. United States, 9 Cir., 248 F. 201, 160 C.C.A. 279, certiorari denied 249 U.S. 618, 39 S.Ct 391, 63 L.Ed. 804. 7 Wall. 482, 487, 19 L.Ed. 278. The Court also said, in support of its conclusion: “The common sense…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw