SPERRY OIL & GAS COMPANY ET AL.

v.

PEARL CHISHOLM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kan. City Terminal Ry. Co. v. Cent. Union Tr. Co. of N.Y., 271 U.S. 445 (U.S. 1926)
• Sperry OIL & GAS Co. v. Chisholm, 264 U.S. 488 (U.S. 1924)
  …ce with the plaintiffs’ possession of the premises.1 This decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 282 Fed. 93. An appeal to this Court was allowed by a Circuit Judge; and thereafter the appellants were also granted a writ of certiorari. 261 U. S. 611. As the suit was removed to the federal court upon the ground that it arose under the laws of the United States,2 the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals was not made final by the provisions of § 128 of the Judicial Code and § 3 of the Act of Se…
• Am. Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 122 F.2d 454 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …. 901, 924; Frank, Reflections on Corporate Reorganizations, 19 Va.L.R. 541, 563; Note, 1 V. of Chi. L.R. 805, 807. With one notable exception, Phipps v. Chicago, Rock Island R. I. & P. R. Co., 8 Cir., 284 F. 945, 28 A.L.R. 1184, certiorari granted 261 U.S. 611, 43 S.Ct. 363, 67 L.Ed. 826, dismissed per stipulation 262 U.S. 762, 43 S. Ct. 701, 67 L.Ed. 1221, the device of the judicial sale at a fair upset price was the standard means of securing majority control in reorganization through equity receivershi…