C. DALE WOLFE, TRUSTEE, ETC.

v.

G. F. KILLINGSWORTH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lukon v. Pa. R. Co., 131 F.2d 327 (3d Cir. 1942)
  …s presented to those cases arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act involving defective or improperly cared for appliances or equipment. See the decision in Central R. Co. of New Jersey v. Peluso, 2 Cir., 286 F. 661, 667, certiorari denied 261 U.S. 613, 43 S.Ct. 359, 67 L.Ed. 827, and the decision of the Supreme Court in Southern Ry.-Carolina Division v. Bennett, 233 U.S. 80, 86, 34 S.Ct. 566, 58 L.Ed. 860. In such cases the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable. The burden of going forward…
• Leathem Smith-Putnam Navigation Co. v. Osby, 79 F.2d 280 (7th Cir. 1935)
  …and contributory negligence have been abolished except that the latter may mitigate damages. Consequently, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is unhampered in its application. See Central R. Co. v. Peluso (C. C. A. 2) 286 F. 661, certiorari denied 261 U. S. 613, 43 S. Ct. 359, 67 L. Ed. 827; New Orleans & N. E. R. Co. v. Harris, 247 U. S. 367, 38 S. Ct. 535, 62 L. Ed. 1167; Looney v. Metropolitan R. Co., 200 U. S. 480, 26 S. Ct. 303, 50 L. Ed. 564; Patton v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., 179 U. S. 658, 21 S. Ct…