AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL.

v.

M. F. BRABHAM

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Thurman v. State, 116 Fla. 426 (Fla. 1934)
  …ontraband articles, without a search [*436] warrant based on probable cause, and the other requirements of Section 22 of our bill of rights, is not contemplated by that constitutional provision. See U. S. v. McBride, 287 Fed. 214; certiorari denied, 261 U. S. 614. This provision makes the question of “probable cause”'a judicial question, •to be determined by a judge or magistrate before he issues 'the search warrant, whereas Section 7664 delegates this judicial power to the seizing officer. In this case the…
• Davis v. Brewer, 135 Fla. 752 (Fla. 1939)
  …ers of the property,—that the defendants Knight and Davis were residents of Bradford County. A record of deed is constructive notice of what appears on its face. Charles v. Roxana Petroleum Corp., 282 Fed. 983—certiorari denied (1923) 43 S. Ct. 361, 261 U. S. 614; 67 L. Ed. 827. See also Sapp v. Warner, 105 Fla. 245, 141 So. 124. The courts may take judicial cognizance that Bradford County is a small, sparsely settled county. The record shows that the defendants were well known by the officers and citizens…
• Maynard Paul Monnette and Robert Christianson Noreng v. United States, 299 F.2d 847 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …he premises was a very strong factor in showing probable cause. This distinctive odor alone has been held to furnish probable cause for a search of the building from which the odor rises, McBride v. United States, 284 F. 416 (5 C.A.1922), cert. den. 261 U.S. 614, 43 S.Ct. 359, 67 L.Ed. 827, or at least to justify the issuance of a warrant to search that building, Johnson v. U. S., 333 U.S. 10, 13 (1948), Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 81 S.Ct. 776, 5 L.Ed.2d 45 (1961). The Johnson and Chapman cases…