W. EVERETT ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, 384 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …2nd Ed., 1966). This principle is as applicable to admiralty as to other proceedings. Bowker v. United States, 186 U.S. 135, 22 S.Ct. 802, 46 L.Ed. 1090 (1902); France & Canada S.S. Co. v. French Republic, 285 F. 290 (2nd Cir. 1902), cert. denied, 261 U.S. 615, 43 S.Ct. 361, 67 L.Ed. 828 (1923); 4 Benedict, Admiralty § 554 (6th Ed., 1940). Since the cross libel arose out of the same transaction as gave rise to the libel there can be no doubt that the “judicial unit” includes both claims.2 We conclude, t…
• Barbarino v. Stanhope S. S. Co., 150 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …any rights and liabilities between the libellant and respondent. See Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co., 287 U.S. 474, 481, 53 S.Ct. 252, 77 L.Ed. 439; France & Canada S. S. Co. v. French Republic, 2 Cir., 285 F. 290, 294, certiorari denied 261 U.S. 615, 43 S.Ct. 361, 67 L.Ed. 828; The Maria, 2 Cir., 67 F. 2d 571; The Natchez, 5 Cir., 78 F. 183. A fortiori the order denying the respondent’s motion for a rehearing is not reviewable. Conboy v. First Nat. Bank, 203 U.S. 141, 145, 27 S.Ct. 50, 51 L.Ed.…
• Kosutic Velidor v. L/P/G Benghazi, 653 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1981)
  …t seeks to procure goods for a governmental purpose. See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Fed’l Repub. of Nigeria, 647 F. 2d 300, 308-09 (2d Cir. 1981). . See, e.g., Everett v. U. S., 277 F. 256 (D.Wis.), aff'd, 284 F. 203 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 261 U.S. 615, 43 S.Ct. 361, 67 L.Ed. 828 (1921); The Acorn, 32 F. 638 (D.Pa.1887). . See Ruggiero v. Compania Peruana De Vapores, 639 F. 2d 872 (2d Cir. 1981) (Longshoremen and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act case; court holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1330 is exclusiv…