ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

U.S. | 1923-02-26
No. 834
261 U.S. 616 Supreme Court of the United States (1923) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …they cannot be persuasively cited in a litigation context. See, e. g., Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn. v. United States, 362 U. S. 458 (1960); Aluminum Co. of America v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 284 F. 401 (C. A. 3d Cir. 1922), cert. denied, 261 U. S. 616 (1923), modification denied, 299 F. 361 (C. A. 3d Cir. 1924). United States v. New England Fish Exchange, 258 F. 732 (D. C. D. Mass. 1919), modification denied, 292 F. 511 (D. C. D. Mass. 1923), on which appellees place great reliance, is not a cl…
  • …8 U.S. 781, 811, 66 S.Ct. 1125, 90 L. Ed. 1575. . International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 1930, 280 U.S. 291, 298-299, 50 S.Ct. 89, 74 L.Ed. 431; Aluminum Co. of America v. Federal Trade Comm., 3 Cir, 1922, 284 F. 401, certiorari denied 261 U.S. 616, 43 S.Ct. 362, 67 L.Ed. 828; V. Vivaudou, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir, 1931, 54 F. 2d 273. . In the Standard Oil ease Justice Frankfurter said: “Since it is the preservation of competition which is at stake, the significant proportion o…
  • …ien of the mortgage.” But the latter continued to dispute the court’s ruling until the court ordered the trial to proceed. These principles of course apply to a consent decree, Snell v. J. C. Turner Lumber Co., 2 Cir., 285 F. 356, certiorari denied 261 U.S. 616, 43 S.Ct. 362, 67 L.Ed. 828; Harding v. Harding, 198 U.S. 317, 335, 25 S.Ct. 679, 49 L.Ed. 1066; indeed, the cases hold that, save for fraud, a consent judgment cannot be vacated as can an ordinary judgment in invitum. Thompson v. Maxwell Land-Grant…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw