CLARENCE D. KELLER ET AL., ETC.

v.

ADAMS CAMPBELL COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• People of the State of N.Y. v. Jersawit in Bankr. of Ajax Dress Co., Inc., 263 U.S. 493 (U.S. 1924)
  …Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the Court. This case comes here upon certiorari, 262 U. S. 741, to review a decision apportioning a claim in bankruptcy for taxes, presented by the State of New York. 290 Fed. 950. On Décember 22, 1920, a petition was filed against the Ajax Dress Company, a manufacturing or mercantile corporation of the State…
• Gerdes in Bankruptcy of Lustgarten v. Lustgarten, 266 U.S. 321 (U.S. 1924)
  …ulty bookkeeping and “ not to any intent to conceal financial conditions.” The order of the District Court was accordingly reversed, with instructions to grant the discharge. 289 Fed. 481. Thereafter this writ of cer-tiorari was granted the trustee. 262 U. S. 741. 1. On the question of the continuing effect of a false financial statement, there is a conflict of opinion between the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and those for the Third and Fifth Circuits. In Ragan v. Cotton (5th Circ.), 200…
• Nat'l Nut Co. of Cal. v. Sontag Chain Stores Co., 107 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1939)
  …acture and' sale of their own on a substantial basis. We therefore think it clear that thé appellees had and have such intervening rights as were properly protected by the court below.” (Italics supplied.) Certiorari having been previously granted, 262 U.S. 741, 43 S.Ct. 702, 67 L.Ed. 1209, in the Keller case, it was dismissed by the United States Supreme Court for the reason that the plaintiff’s patent had not been infringed and that, therefore, the question of intervening rights was not involved (264 U.S…