ORLANDO LEE CLEVELAND
v.
ROBERT MATTINGLY, JUDGE, ETC.
ORLANDO LEE CLEVELAND
ROBERT MATTINGLY, JUDGE, ETC.
262 U.S. 744
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fraser v. Doing, 130 F.2d 617 (D.C. Cir. 1942)…975: ‘“The purpose of a bill of review is to obtain a reversal or modification of a final decree. * * * ’ ” Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 10 Cir., 69 F. 2d 19, 24; Rudolph v. Hunt, 52 App.D.C. 343, 286 F. 1007, certiorari denied 262 U.S. 744, 43 S.Ct. 521, 67 L.Ed. 1211. McMicken’s Executors v. Perin, 63 U.S. 282, 285, 22 How. 282, 16 L.Ed. 259. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Hensey, 205 U.S. 298, 306, 27 S.Ct. 535, 51 L.Ed. 811, 10 Ann.Cas. 572. Hardt v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Cir., 91 F. 2d 875,…
-
Commercial Credit Co. v. United States, 17 F.2d 902 (9th Cir. 1927)…roceedings under said section of the Revised Statutes. Two acts made penal may be separately punished, though both are° involved in but one transaction. Gracie v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 644; Bell v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 285 F. 145, certiorari denied 262 U. S. 744, 43 S. Ct. 521, 67 L. Ed. 1211; Earl et al. v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 532; Albrecht et al. v. U. S. (decided by U. S. Supreme Court Jan. 3,1927) 47 S. Ct. 250, 71 L. Ed. -. The disposition of the automobile not being involved in a conviction for…
-
United States v. ONE Oldsmobile COUPÉ (D. Idaho 1927)…proceedings under said section of the Revised Statutes. Two acts made penal may be separately punished, though both are involved in but one transaction. Gracie v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 644; Bell v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 285 F. 145, certiorari denied 262 U. S. 744, 43 S. Ct. 521, 67 L. Ed. 1211; Earl et al. v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 532; Albrecht et al. v. U. S. (decided by U. S. Supreme Court Jan. 3, 1927) [273 U. S. 1] 47 S. Ct. 250, 71 L. Ed. 505. The disposition of the automobile not being involved in…