JAMES C. DAVIS, AS AGENT, ETC.
v.
CHARLES HAREFORD
JAMES C. DAVIS, AS AGENT, ETC.
CHARLES HAREFORD
262 U.S. 745
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jackson v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co., 7 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1925)…ed. But the rule is otherwise when the policy is mailed to the agent for delivery only on the performance of certain conditions.” The text is well supported by authority. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Rutherford (C. C. A.) 284 F. 707 (certiorari denied 262 U. S. 745, 43 S. Ct. 521, 67 L. Ed. 1211); Yonge v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. (C. C.) 30 F. 902; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Babcock, 104 Ga. 67, 30 S. E. 273, 42 L. R. A. 88, 69 Am. St. Rep. 134; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Mason, 151 Ark. 135, 235 S. W. 422,…