SAMUEL KRIVIT ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
SAMUEL KRIVIT ET AL.
UNITED STATES
262 U.S. 750
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryan Cnty. v. United States, 123 F.2d 782 (10th Cir. 1941)…, the claim for the tax refund was ultimately denied on the ground that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations of the State of Oklahoma. Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners of Bryan County, 88 Okl. 147, 211 P. 1040, and certiorari denied 262 U.S. 750, 43 S.Ct. 525; 67 L.Ed. 1214. See Board of Commissioners of Love County v. Ward, 68 Okl. 287, 173 P. 1050; Johnson v. Grady County, 50 Okl. 188, 150 P. 497; Atoka County v. Oklahoma State Bank, 62 Okl. 57, 161 P. 1087; In re Hick [*785] man, 63 Okl…
-
Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Creek Cnty. v. Seber, 130 F.2d 663 (10th Cir. 1942)…n any way whatever on the part of the United States, the statute of limitations and mandatory preliminary requirements as to state procedure applies. In Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners of Bryan County, 88 Okl. 147, 211 P. 1040, certiorari denied 262 U.S. 750, 43 S.Ct. 525, 67 L.Ed. 214, it was held that the statute of limitations in such a case constituted a bar to the parties thereto. See, also, Ward v. Board of County Com’rs of Love County, 253 U.S. 17, 40 S.Ct. 419, 64 L.Ed. 751; Carter v. Collins, 1…