SAMUEL KRIVIT ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1923-05-07
No. 1011
262 U.S. 750 Supreme Court of the United States (1923) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bryan Cnty. v. United States, 123 F.2d 782 (10th Cir. 1941)
    …, the claim for the tax refund was ultimately denied on the ground that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations of the State of Oklahoma. Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners of Bryan County, 88 Okl. 147, 211 P. 1040, and certiorari denied 262 U.S. 750, 43 S.Ct. 525; 67 L.Ed. 1214. See Board of Commissioners of Love County v. Ward, 68 Okl. 287, 173 P. 1050; Johnson v. Grady County, 50 Okl. 188, 150 P. 497; Atoka County v. Oklahoma State Bank, 62 Okl. 57, 161 P. 1087; In re Hick [*785] man, 63 Okl…
  • Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Creek Cnty. v. Seber, 130 F.2d 663 (10th Cir. 1942)
    …n any way whatever on the part of the United States, the statute of limitations and mandatory preliminary requirements as to state procedure applies. In Broadwell v. Board of Commissioners of Bryan County, 88 Okl. 147, 211 P. 1040, certiorari denied 262 U.S. 750, 43 S.Ct. 525, 67 L.Ed. 214, it was held that the statute of limitations in such a case constituted a bar to the parties thereto. See, also, Ward v. Board of County Com’rs of Love County, 253 U.S. 17, 40 S.Ct. 419, 64 L.Ed. 751; Carter v. Collins, 1…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw