J. O'NEAL SANDEL, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC.
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1923-10-08
No. 154
263 U.S. 672 Supreme Court of the United States (1923) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99, 101; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185, 186.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Schuette v. Bowers (S.D.N.Y. 1929)
    …ay have been dower rights at the time of the (testator’s death, if the widow thereafter waives them, no deduction from the value of the property is proper under tMs section. Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Edwards (D. C.) 290 F. 617, appeal dismissed 263 U. S. 672, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. 499. In the present case there was no admeasurement of dower, but the widow, taking all the real property, has sold the parts here involved. Two points are argued: (1) Did she elect to waive her dower? And (2) if she did, do…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw