UNITED STATES

v.

J. P. RANSOM

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1960)
  …tax applying alike to all its citizens, it should say so in plain words. Such a conclusion cannot rest on dubious inferences.” 319 U. S., at 607. See, e. g., Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corporation, 276 U. S. 575, 581-582; United States v. Ransom, 263 U. S. 691; Kennedy v. Becker, 241 U. S. 556, 563-564; Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665, 673. [*118] The Federal Power Act constitutes a complete and comprehensive plan for the development and improvement of navigation and for the development, transmission and u…
• Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp., 276 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1928)
  …the land from state taxation for the reason that under the applicable provisions of a different statute, § 5, c. 83, Act of April 18, 1912, 37 Stat. 86, the Secretary was without authority to imposé the restriction. And, in United States v. Ransom, 263 U. S. 691, affirming 284 Fed. 108, it was held, on the authority of McCurdy v. United States, supra, that the state had power to tax lands purchased for a Creek Indian citizen with restrictions against alienation imposed by the Secretary under § 1 of the Act…
• B. Fernandez & Bros. v. Ayllon Y Ojeda, 266 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1924)
  …tice that the record would have disclosed the failure of the guardian to satisfy what it regarded as conditions precedent to the exercise of his power. 288 Fed. 28, sub nom. Ayllon v. Gonzalez. A writ of certiorari was [*146] granted by this Court. [263 U. S. 691.] Of course there is no doubt of our jurisdiction upon certiorari although the respondent seems to have been misled by some decisions upon writs of error. Judicial Code, § 240. We shall assume without argument that the Circuit Court of Appeals also…

Authorities Cited

• McCurdy v. United States, 246 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1918)