UNITED STATES

v.

EDWARD H. CHILDS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Power Comm'n v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1960)
  …tax applying alike to all its citizens, it should say so in plain words. Such a conclusion cannot rest on dubious inferences.” 319 U. S., at 607. See, e. g., Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corporation, 276 U. S. 575, 581-582; United States v. Ransom, 263 U. S. 691; Kennedy v. Becker, 241 U. S. 556, 563-564; Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665, 673. [*118] The Federal Power Act constitutes a complete and comprehensive plan for the development and improvement of navigation and for the development, transmission and u…
• Sunderland v. United States, 266 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1924)
• Shaw v. Gibson-Zahniser Oil Corp., 276 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1928)
  …the land from state taxation for the reason that under the applicable provisions of a different statute, § 5, c. 83, Act of April 18, 1912, 37 Stat. 86, the Secretary was without authority to imposé the restriction. And, in United States v. Ransom, 263 U. S. 691, affirming 284 Fed. 108, it was held, on the authority of McCurdy v. United States, supra, that the state had power to tax lands purchased for a Creek Indian citizen with restrictions against alienation imposed by the Secretary under § 1 of the Act…