PATRICK SINCLAIR BRAGDON, PETITIONER,

v.

GENERAL SPRAY CO. OF S. FLORIDA AND IOWA NATIONAL MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Malu v. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co., 898 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2005)
  …on of section 627.736(l)(a).4 In Hunter, [*75] the court held that medical transportation expenses were reimbursable under the statute. In arriving at this holding, the Fifth District looked to this Court’s decision in Mobley v. Jack & Son Plumbing, 170 So. 2d 41 (Fla.1964). In Mobley, this Court held that a provision of the Workers’ Compensation Law, ch. 440, Fla. Stat. (1963), requiring employer coverage of “such remedial treatment, care and attendance as the injury shall require,” had to he interpreted to…
• S & S Stove Repair, Inc. v. Dumas, 465 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
  …DCA 1983). The acceptance and rejection of medical testimony rests with the deputy and his discretion should not be disturbed unless the medical testimony itself fails to meet the rest of the substantial evidence rule. Mobley v. Jack & Son Plumbing, 170 So. 2d 41, 44 (Fla.1964). Here, the findings of the physician adopted by the deputy comply with the guides and hence are supported by competent substantial evidence. The deputy awarded PPD benefits to claimant under Section 440.15(3)(u), Florida Statutes (19…
• Hunter v. Allstate Ins. Co., 498 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …d apply. Appellee, on the other hand, contends that the fact that transportation costs are specifically included in the workers compensation statute shows the legislative intent to exclude it from the no-fault law. In Mobley v. Jack & Son Plumbing, 170 So. 2d 41 (Fla.1964), the court, in interpreting Chapter 440 prior to the addition of the provision allowing specifically for the recovery of transportation expenses,2 held that the provision which required that the employer provide “such remedial treatment,…