GEORGE R. MEEK

v.

CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL.; FLORENCE F. DALE V. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., ETC.; AND ANDREW BREEZE V. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. S. Pac. Co. & James C. Davis, 268 U.S. 146 (U.S. 1925)
  …basis. And the petition asserts that thereby any claim of the Southern Pacific Company against petitioner was extinguished, because a settlement with one joint tortfeasor precludes recovery from the other for the same loss. The petition wps granted. 263 U. S. 696. Later, the order granting the writ was vacated as to personal injury, cargo and passenger claimants against whom no error was assigned. 263 U. S. 681. By leave of this Court, additional testimony relating to. the settlement was taken in accordance…
• Meek v. Ctr. Cnty. Banking Co., 268 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1925)
  …nkrupts, and moved to dismiss it to that extent. Orders denying these motions were entered by the District Court; and these, on petitions to revise, were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 292 Fed. 116. Writs of certiorari were then granted. 263 U. S. 696. [*428] Thereafter, but before the hearing in this court, Shugert died. The defendants then moved in this court that the proceeding in bankruptcy be dismissed as to them, both individually and as members of the partnership, on the ground that to tha…
• State of Mo. Ex rel. ST. Louis v. Taylor, 266 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1924)
  …ying that the judge of the inferior court be enjoined from taking cognizance of the pending action because he lacked jurisdiction. The highest court of the State denied relief. 298 Mo. 474. The case is here on writ of error; and also on certiorari, 263 U. S. 696. The suggestion was made, at the argument, that this Court is without jurisdiction, because the judgment below was not final. The contrary is settled. The application for a writ of prohibition is an independent adversary suit which was finally deter…