STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL.
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL.
263 U.S. 696
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. S. Pac. Co. & James C. Davis, 268 U.S. 146 (U.S. 1925)…basis. And the petition asserts that thereby any claim of the Southern Pacific Company against petitioner was extinguished, because a settlement with one joint tortfeasor precludes recovery from the other for the same loss. The petition wps granted. 263 U. S. 696. Later, the order granting the writ was vacated as to personal injury, cargo and passenger claimants against whom no error was assigned. 263 U. S. 681. By leave of this Court, additional testimony relating to. the settlement was taken in accordance…
-
State of Mo. Ex rel. ST. Louis v. Taylor, 266 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1924)…ying that the judge of the inferior court be enjoined from taking cognizance of the pending action because he lacked jurisdiction. The highest court of the State denied relief. 298 Mo. 474. The case is here on writ of error; and also on certiorari, 263 U. S. 696. The suggestion was made, at the argument, that this Court is without jurisdiction, because the judgment below was not final. The contrary is settled. The application for a writ of prohibition is an independent adversary suit which was finally deter…