JAMES C. DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL, ETC.

v.

STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• Ford Motor Co. v. Bradley Transp. Co, 174 F.2d 192 (6th Cir. 1949)
  …date of the accident or injury. Taylor v. Bay City St. Railway Company, 101 Mich. 140, 59 N.W. 447; Gates v. Comstock, 113 Mich. 127, 71 N.W. 515; Standard Oil Co. v. Payne, 220 Mich. 663, 190 N.W. 769, certiorari denied, Davis v. Standard Oil Co., 263 U.S. 699, 44 S.Ct. 5, 68 L.Ed. 513. The District Court found the amount of loss on the Hulett was plainly fixed within a month after the damage, and that damage growing out of the fact that the Hulett could not be replaced until the beginning of navigation…
• Bradley v. Md. Cas. Co., 382 F.2d 415 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …inal complaint, alleges only a statutory cause of action. The district court’s denial of recovery on this count was correct. This court’s decision in United States for Use of W. B. Young Supply Co. v. Stewart, 288 F. 187 (8 Cir. 1923), cert. denied 263 U.S. 699, 44 S.Ct. 5, 68 L.Ed. 513, urged upon us by Bradley, does not have significance here. Our holding in that ease was only that a surety’s obligation is to be measured by the bond he executes and not by any separate and broader statutory undertaking of…
• Am. Cas. Co. of Reading v. Brezina Constr. Co., Inc., 295 F.2d 603 (8th Cir. 1961)
  …this is so even though the subcontract did require the subcontractor to “furnish” the materials. It is urged that such a holding is compelled by U. S. for Use of W. B. Young Supply Co. v. Stewart, et al., 8 Cir., 1923, 288 F. 187, certiorari denied 263 U.S. 699, 44 S.Ct. 5, 68 L.Ed. 513, and Crow & Crow, Inc. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 247 Minn. 426, 77 N.W. 2d 429. We recognize that in the foregoing cases the court used language which standing alone supports the argument that a contractual obli…

  ← 1 / 2 →