CHARLES H. ADDINGTON, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, ETC.
v.
FORSYTH METAL GOODS COMPANY
CHARLES H. ADDINGTON, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, ETC.
FORSYTH METAL GOODS COMPANY
263 U.S. 700
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. McLOUTH (E.D. Mich. 1925)…rtiorari denied October 22, 1923, 263 U. S. 709, 44 S. Ct. 36, 68 L. Ed. 518, and the defendant relying upon Todd Dry Dock & Construction Corporation v. Sumner Iron Works (C. C. A.) 289 F. 217, decided May 7, 1923, certiorari denied October 8, 1923, 263 U. S. 700, 44 S. Ct. 5, 68 L. Ed. 513. In the latter case the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit apparently reached a conclusion different from that of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in the former case. The Todd Case, first…
-
Ingram-Day Lumber Co. v. McLOUTH, 13 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1926)…. That case and American Chain Co. v. Interstate Iron & Steel Co., supra, were both pending in the Supreme Court at the same time, upon petitions for writs of certiorari, which petitions wore denied, on October 8 and October 22, .1923, respectively. 263 U. S. 700, 44 S. Ct. 5, 68 L. Ed. 513; 263 U. S. 709, 44 S. Ct. 36, 68 L. Ed. 518. This, we think, is the correct construction of these acts. They were passed to meet the exigencies of war, and because of the impossibility of knowing when the war would end,…