JEFF HANCIL ROGERS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Balding v. Fleisher, 279 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
  …ining was against the appellant wife. It is well established in Florida law that property held as a tenancy by the entireties cannot be made available to answer for the judgment debts of one of the tenants individually. France v. Hart, Fla.App.1964, 170 So. 2d 52; Crawford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1962, 139 So. 2d 500; Winters v. Parks, Fla.1956, 91 So. 2d 649; Meyer v. Faust, Fla.1955, 83 So. 2d 847; Hunt v. Covington, 145 Fla. 706, 200 So. 76. Appellees, as purchasers of the prope…
• Sucher v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 238 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …aysian dollars) for a specific premium (three Malaysian dollars). The insurance policy furnished by Malaysian Airways thus meets three of the four criteria of a “specific policy” set forth in the Badger Mutual case. In France v. Hart, Fla.App.1965, 170 So. 2d 52, this court defined “specific property” as “property capable of identification.” The only property capable of identification named in the waybill was “three suitcases.” The personal property for which loss is claimed (no particulars as to items is p…

Authorities Cited

• Davis v. State, 166 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
• Leslie E. McCLURE (three cases) v. State, 104 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)