GUILLERMO SEVERINO

v.

FABIOLA SEVERINO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Elliotte v. Am. Sav. Bank & Tr. Co., 18 F.2d 460 (6th Cir. 1927)
  …in the four months’ period, when the depositor' was insolvent) and when the bank had reasonable cause to believe that such deposits would effect a preference. Merrimack Bank v. Bailey (C. C. A. 1) 289 F. 468, certiorari denied by the Supreme Court, 263 U. S. 704, 44 S. Ct. 33, 68 L. Ed. 515. So far as reasonable cause on the part of the bank to believe that preferences were obtained may be thought necessary to recovery, we think the circumstances constrain us to find the existence of such reasonable cause.…
• In re Applied Logic Corp. v. Gutterman, 576 F.2d 952 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …toff of nonwithdrawable deposits do not discuss the four-months requirement of § 60 a(l) is not because it does not apply but because it was so clearly satisfied. See, e. g., Merrimack Nat’l Bank v. Bailey, 289 F. 2d 468, 470 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 263 U.S. 704, 44 S.Ct. 33, 68 L.Ed. 515 (1923) (requirement mentioned); Goldstein v. Franklin Square Nat’l Bank, 107 F. 2d 393 (2 Cir. 1939) (requirement mentioned); Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co., 270 F. 2d 823, 834 (5 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 962,…
• In re PRS Prods., Inc. v. Mandan Sec. Bank, 574 F.2d 414 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …y v. Boylston Nat’l Bank, 229 U.S. 523, 33 S.Ct. 806, 57 L.Ed. 1313 (1913), and in New York County Nat’l Bank v. Massey, 192 U.S. 138, 24 S.Ct. 199, 48 L.Ed. 380 (1904). . In Merrimack Nat’l Bank v. Bailey, 289 F. 468, 470 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 263 U.S. 704, 44 S.Ct. 33, 68 L.Ed. 515 (1923), the court rejected the argument that a bank cannot become a preferred creditor because it may honor checks on the deposits. Cf. Katz v. First Nat’l Bank, 568 F. 2d 964 (2d Cir. 1977).…