ADAM KLUCHINSKY ET AL., ETC.

v.

JOHN ZERNOSKY, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Emmett E. Page v. ST. Louis Sw. Ry. Co., 349 F.2d 820 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …, there is an intervening change in the law by authoritative declaration of the authoritative court. Lumbermen’s Mutual Cas. Co. v. Wright, 5 Cir., 1963, 322 F. 2d 759, 763; Pacific American Fisheries v. Hoof, 9 Cir., 1923, 291 F. 306, cert. denied, 263 U.S. 712, 44 S.Ct. 38, 68 L.Ed. 520; Messinger v. Anderson, 1912, 225 U.S. 436, 32 S.Ct. 739, 56 L.Ed. 1152. As to the second, we think there is no substantial basis for distinguishing this case from Eichel and Tipton. One distinction suggested is the absen…
• Gillam v. United States, 27 F.2d 296 (4th Cir. 1928)
  …relies. Maul v. U. S., 274 U. S. 501, 47 S. Ct. 735, 71 L. Ed. 1171; The Squanto (C. C. A. 2d) 13 F.(2d) 548; Arch v. U. S. (C. C. A. 5th) 13 F.(2d) 382; The Henry L. Marshall (C. C. A. 2d) 292 F. 486; Id. (D. C.) 286 F. 260, certiorari denied 263 U. S. 712, 44 S. Ct. 38, 68 L. Ed. 519; U. S. v. Bengochea (C. C. A. 5th) 279 F. 537; The Mistinguette (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 753; The Pesaquid (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 308. [5] We think it equally clear that these statutes are valid, notwithstanding the fact that the…
• The Sagatind. the Diamantina, 11 F.2d 673 (2d Cir. 1926)
  …they all prohibit or punish, or both, acts done within the jurisdiction of the United States and the courts thereof, and they have recently received consideration by us in The Henry L. Marshall (C. C. A.) 292 F. 486 (certiorari denied 44 S. Ct. 38, 263 U. S. 712, 68 L. Ed. 519, 520), Romano v. United States (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 522, and United States v. 2180 Cases of Champagne (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 710. These decisions hold that a vessel lying 22 miles off our coast is on the high seas; that a sale or gift of…