CHARLES D. NEWTON, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

v.

NEWTOWN GAS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Dade Cnty. v. Gen. Waterworks Corp., 35 Fla. Supp. 71 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1971)
  …t be performed by the Legislature either directly or by any method of indirection.” Spafford v. Brevard County, supra, 110 So. 451, 454 . . . National City Bank v. United States, 275 Fed. 275, judgment affirmed 281 Fed. 754, writ of error dismissed 263 U.S. 726, holds that neither the Congress, nor the executive officers of the government, can determine what is just compensation for private property to be taken for public purposes, or prescribe rules of its computation, because the question is judicial and…
• Davis v. Newton Coal Co., 267 U.S. 292 (U.S. 1925)
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 62 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1933)
  …, 1922. Newton v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 258 U. S. 604, 42 S. Ct. 313, 66 L. Ed. 785. A final deeroe in favor of one of the subsidiaries, Newtown Gas Company, was entered in October, 1921, and the appeal therefrom was dismissed by consent in 1923. 263 U. S. 726, 44 S. Ct. 4, 68 L. Ed. [*506] 527. Final decrees in favor of the other subsidiaries were entered in September, 1922; and not appealed. Prior to 1922 and pursuant to court decrees, either'interlocutory or final, all moneys in excess of the statutory…