HENRY LEWIS

v.

DAVIS ROBERTS, JR., AS TRUSTEE, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery, 269 U.S. 177 (U.S. 1925)
  …on-infringement. 284 Fed. 518. On appeal, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the patent was invalid for want of invention. 291 Fed. 486. In view of the conflict of decision, the writ of certiorari was granted by this Court (264 U. S. 578) to review the determination in the Third Circuit. Thomson Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 265 U. S. 445. Both suits involved claims numbered 1, 2, 5 and 13 of the Callahan Patent for “ Material Transferring Apparatus ” designed for use in transferring concr…
• Lewis v. Roberts, 267 U.S. 467 (U.S. 1925)
  …ed an order of the referee disallowing this claim, upon the ground that- a judgment founded upon a tort was not provable, in bankruptcy. This decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 294 Fed. 171. The writ of certiorari was then granted. 264 U. S. 578. This decision is in conflict with an unbroken line of decisions in other Circuit Courts of Appeals and in the District. Courts. Re New York Tunnel Co. (C. C. A.), 159 Fed. 688, 690; Moore v. Douglas (C. C. A.), 230 Fed. 399, 401; Re Putnam (D. C.)…
• Davis v. Mich. Tr. Co., 2 F.2d 194 (6th Cir. 1924)
  …ncing such insolvency had occurred. Priority under section 3466 was denied, primarily for the reasons stated in the last sentence herein above quoted from U. S. v. Oklahoma. See, too, Anderson v. Myers (C. C. A.) 296 F. 101, 103, certiorari granted 264 U. S. 578, 44 S. Ct. 335, 68 L. Ed. 858. When the substance of this section was first enacted in 1789, there was no federal Bankruptcy Act, and the provision was doubtless intended to give the government priority in the distribution of a living debtor’s asse…