HORACE VAN DEVENTER
v.
WHOLESALE MERCHANTS WAREHOUSE COMPANY

U.S. | 1924-03-17
No. 657
264 U.S. 589 Supreme Court of the United States (1924) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gilmore v. United States (two cases), 131 F.2d 873 (8th Cir. 1942)
    …States v. Benz, 282 U.S. 304, 306-307, 51 S.Ct. 113, 75 L. Ed. 354; Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 300 U.S. 131, 136, 137, 57 S.Ct. 382, 81 L.Ed. 557; Greyerbiehl v. Hughes Electric Co., 8 Cir., 294 F. 802, 806, certiorari denied 264 U.S. 589, 44 S.Ct. 402, 68 L.Ed. 864; Woods Bros. Const. Co., Inc., v. Yankton County, S. D„ 8 Cir., 54 E.2d 304, 308-310, 81 A.L.R. 300; Pattison v. United States, 9 Cir., 2 E.2d 14, 15; Hynes v. United States, 7 Cir., 35 F. 2d 734, 735; Fine v. United Stat…
  • United States v. Rudd (E.D.N.Y. 1927)
    …ught hero on writ of error. It is the filing of the writ of error in the court below which removes the case and gives this court jurisdiction. Greyerbiehl v. Hughes Elec. Co. (C. C. A.) 294 F. 802,” affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States 264 U. S. 589, 44 S. Ct. 402, 68 L. Ed. 864. The defendant had until May 7th within which to present the writ of error. Tho writ of error was not presented until the 17th of May, which was not timely. The court has no power to extend the time within which the de…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw