STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL.

U.S. | 1924-05-05
No. 607
265 U.S. 569 Supreme Court of the United States (1924) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Standard Oil Company of New Jersey sought leave to take additional testimony in its dispute with Southern Pacific Company and others, which the Supreme Court granted subject to procedural requirements including submission of interrogatories by June 1st, cross-interrogatories by June 20th, and completion of testimony by September 1st, with costs to be borne by the petitioner.

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

The motion for leave to take additional testimony is granted, such testimony to be taken, however, in accordance with Rule 12, paragraph 2, of the rules of this Court, to be limited to the subject matter specified in the motion, and to be upon interrogatories presented and served upon the opposite party by the petitioner on or before the 1st day of June next, and upon cross-interrogatories to be filed on or before the 20th day of June next. The commission with the interrogatories for the taking of said testimony shall issue to the clerk of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and the interrogatories and the evidence taken shall be forwarded to this Court on or before the 1st day of September next. The costs of the commission, when incurred, shall be paid by the petitioner. Mr. John M. Woolsey and Mr. W. H. McGrann, for petitioner, in support of the motion. Mr. Charles C. Burlingham, Mr. Ray Rood Allen and Mr. A. Howard Neely, for respondents, in opposition to the motion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. S. Pac. Co. & James C. Davis, 268 U.S. 146 (U.S. 1925)
    …he writ was vacated as to personal injury, cargo and passenger claimants against whom no error was assigned. 263 U. S. 681. By leave of this Court, additional testimony relating to. the settlement was taken in accordance with paragraph 2 of rule 12. 265 U. S. 569. The material facts may be briefly stated. December 28, 1917, the President took over the combined rail and water transportation system of the Southern Pacific Company and its subsidiaries. February 19, 1919, the Director General and the owner Ánad…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw