JAMES C. DAVIS, AGENT, ETC.,

v.

L. D. ALEXANDER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Davis v. Alexander, 269 U.S. 114 (U.S. 1925)
  …n Texas. The jury returned a verdict for the entire damages. Judgment entered thereon was affirmed by the highest court of the [*116] State. 93 Okla. 159. A petition for a writ of certiorari was granted under § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended. 265 U. S. 577. The lines of the Rock Island in Texas were owned by a subsidiary — the Chicago, Rock Island and Gulf Railway Company, a Texas corporation. The petition described Davis as Agent, United States Railroad Administration, in charge of Chicago, Rock Isl…
• Mo. Pac. R.R. Co. v. Reynolds-Davis Grocery Co., 268 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1925)
  …tial nor the delivering carrier. The court refused to rule as requested; the jury found for the plaintiff; and the judgment entered -on the verdict was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Arkansas. 161 Ark. 579. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. 265 U. S. 577. The joint through rate covered delivery at the warehouse of the consignee. The bill of lading named Morgan’s. Louisiana & Texas Railroad and Steamship Company as the initial carrier and the route designated therein named the Missouri Pacific as th…
• Cami v. Cent. Victoria, Ltd., 268 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1925)
  …3, but the judgment was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 295 Fed. 809, following its decision on the same day in Successors of C. & J. Fantauzzi v. Municipal Assembly of Arroyo, 295 Fed. 803. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 265 U. S. 577. Had the Circuit Court of Appeals deferred to the local interpretation of Porto Rican statutes, we should not have granted a writ. We repeatedly have stated the reason for such deference, and we believe that the appellate jurisdiction was granted wi…